detain their rights

The terrorists want to disrupt our way of life, right?
They are generally more interested in blowing up each other, right?
So when we take the detainees, we feed them more than they would get under their military, give them many comforts that they don't have, and then the government that are battling (United States) has so many lawyers, they get one of those too?

OK. If you are a lawyer, want to represent a detainee, go ahead, but ... you are then required by become a citizen of that detainee's country. If you don't like that policy, then stop being a lawyer.

That is beyond fudged up! What a crock of bullcrap! I don''t mind the citizens obtaining lawyers, but they are NOT being held by a civil court ... it is a military issue of a foreign fighter who likely killed more of his own countrymen than US soldiers. The fact that he might have info on more important targets superceeds rights in this case which may not be the Bill of Rights offered to US citizens in a US court of law.

ACLU, Jessie Jackson strong. Where we often pick the wrong battle so that we aren't forgotten. Clearly this armed robber was not given proper service at McDonald's while robbing it, because his is black. Then, they clearly chose a colder, older hamburger to give him as he fled the scene, knocking over an elderly couple. These are clearly racially motivated crimes against this four-time felon.