"would you have done it if her husband were standing there?The recipient of the massage is not and has not been married. It's really charming that you should bring this up though.
mmmno... no you wouldn't have.
hell... that's where you're goin'."
If, when I held her arm across her belly so that I didn't touch her wrongfully, would that have been a problem?
If I mentioned that her boyfriend could finish other areas like her legs, as those were areas I wasn't doing, was that wrongful? If after the massage, she talks candidly about a personal doctor's appointment and her fears about it, is that wrongful?
I guess I should have pointed out the obvious that it wasn't sexual ... like the title said. I guess I should have written that I tried to get this young lady to think about a situation that was worrisome. In that I stated that I had stuff for her if she pursued the same vocation as I had (teaching).
I should have explained my wonder as to how someone could be so willing to be physically intimate with another person, yet be closed off -- telling little of themselves (herself), hidden in a "you wouldn't want to know", in other words, 'I'm not saying'. My point of the post was just that. How the @#%%@% you got going to hell for inappropriate conduct with a woman without her husband around is, well odd.
I'm happy you get to damn others. I wouldn't want the job. I'd never get it right.
1 comment:
oh sorry... then I MEANT to say...
Would you have done it if her boyfriend were standing right there?
When a man lies he murders some part of the world.
Your suffering will be legendary... even in hell.
Post a Comment