Gradually degenerating into ignorance and complacency.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Passing it on

Apparently my political entries and save the Earth statements have been regarded as schtupid, refreshing me in a a light-hearted way with George Carlin. Apart from the typos, there is something to be said about the trash build up and passing the problem along. Ibelieve that some have mentioned that "passing it along" didn't work many times, including with Saddam and his open defiance to resolutions. If we were to pass it along, we would be doing the same thing opposed by many with the U.N's stagnatation to Iraq, not to mention paying for the many projects we have.

Passing it on isn't really a great thing, right? I could say, hey, open up the steel mills in Pittsburgh again, it's somebody else's concern. We need that steal! Go ahead and build batteries wherever. I think only ffols believe that carbon emissions don't damage the environment.

As mentioned before, the planet rebuilds and destroys, as part of its cycle, but satellite data does indicate a growing depletion in the ozone. While the process of its depletion is being argued, encouraging its destruction through carbon emisisions is whole-heartedly stupid. There sould be the recycling of anything possible. We kill trees, lose oxygen, we either adapt or die to smaller oxygen levels and higher temperatures, greater climatic changes due to ocean changes ... and so on.

Large unrecylced plastic piles larger than the oldest trees ... lovely, nice, helpful ... or just plain stupid.

The "plastic, jerk" notwithstanding making changes now helps humans now. I don't think passing the problem solves it, in fact ... I know it doesn't.

I find it odd that scientists working for drug companies can come up with data that the drug doesn't have the side effects listed, but indepedant studies indicate there are potential problems. Would you believe the drug company investigating itself or an independant group?

The same here ... the 4 our of 5 dentists are probably right, not the one obstinant one.

3 comments:

MR said...

Point was: George Carlin, God to most liberals, says in so many words that we're the flea on the ass of the flea on the ass of the mastodon. And he's MUCH more cynical than you, and since that seems to be the measure of intelligence among liberals--who can be the MOST cynical and the MOST preachy, while mixing in some sing-songy little rhymes that somehow sound fun so they must be right, you know like "if it doesn't fit, you must aquit." I find Carlin to be the MOST cynical and the MOST preachy, therefore, on their own scale, he's the smartest liberal there is. He knows that the most correct answer in his circle is the one that is the MOST anti-establishment. And since he's faded back beyond any political classification, into what seems to be anarchy, he is the most correct. He's even criticizing the criticizers...wow, his IQ must be through the roof. It's funny that the liberals worship him, and were stunned to hear him say all that. The fact is, they ASSUMED he was liberal because he clearly wasn't conservative, and that's pretty much how you classify them today, the liberals and therefore the Democratic party are the heirs to all the ramble that can only be described as "not conservative." This includes homeless, imbalanced, crazy and schizophrenic people who are saturated with paranoia. It also includes the spoiled, who were given everything and think that their lifestyle should apply to all. It includes the disillusioned and the ignorant angry college youth who want a reason to protest something, and want to define themselves to others; their problems are much closer to home. But, the truth is, Carlin is not a liberal, they just thought he was because he likes to bitch. Well, if you know so much about the ozone layer, what are you doing here at, like, the circle-K at 1 in the morning? I'm sure it's your Choice, but if you really had the answers, instead of an inclinationg to believe something that you can preach superiorly at the world's occupancy, they'd be sending you up on this next Shuttle mission. This is a not a good/bad morality issue, therefore we are reliant on the pitching and swaying interpretation of scientists, and the fact that there is no clear evidence that pulverizes one position or another means that it is just plain complicated. Now liberals can say that we should ere on the side of caution, but then they'd come up with more "people suck, the Earth is our God" crap. Funny that the Democrats accuse the Republicans of being fear-mongers with terrorism, while the Democrats have been doing it for decades with their doomsday prophecies. "Hey, Look at me! I'm saying something Terrifying! Look! Give me attention!" Pathetic.

Point you got: I want to talk about plastic.

Marcus said...

Your approach is on the basis that I should know who's liberal and conservatinve and their political affiliation and the impression they leave on these groups ... I don't.

I used to like George Carlin, some of his work. If you'll read the link you sent me, you'll find that it isn't new, but pieced together. No one, not even bored standup repeats themselves to this level. This is 80's/90's stand up and not new. If statellite radio is playing this, then listeners are getting ripped -- old stuff. How about barbershop singing?

I agree that fanatics are fanatical ... regardless whether they are right left blue red or whatever. People naturally congregate toward people who agree with their ideals.

That being written, I wonder why you chose to add the link, relate it to Carlin at all. My stances haven't changed. Who's commenting on my blog writing, MDH, II is right about MDH, II being right?

Reviewing the comment, I find it odd that it was there, considering the flight of the bumblebee blog on which it was based. How it got to liberals and conservatives, right left really baffles me.

MR said...

The commonality was being silly enough to try to catch a bumblebee with your bare hands, and being silly enough to lecture about something that no scientist has proven, therefore, you just picked the side that allowed you to wag your finger at the world.