More glitches in the matrix

I was looking for Cosmos, a series by Carl Sagen, aired on PBS decades ago. I found that there is a pron star with that name. Huh. I suppose next there will be Bill O'Reilly Sexfactor or CNN Hardballs or something. Can you all in the porn industry just cut it out a bit so a search is less of a chore, please? I shouldn't have to go to page 2 or page 6.

I'll look for Antiques Roadshow and see if it hints to porn. Guys, just stop it, okay? I've got it. Yank the porn out of every other channel ... each and everyone by just putting on cable, like some far-out number 92, with porn. Then Nip/Tuck can fold out and so can 99% of "supsense thriller with R near X rating", staring beautiful persons A-E with acting abilities of carpet. I could then turn to regular channels and not have to see it.

That would be nice to not have to have ogligatory sex scene in movie about the AIDS quilt or how Advanced Auto Parts started or any other show. I understand, from my sister, that According to Jim actually had a fart (and sound on it). After nakedness, rape, sodomy, graphic violence, puking, spitting, gutting, fecal matter handling, now, in 2007 they finally allowed the word and the sound, "fart". Boy! I thought getting tax code approved took a long while.

The channel I mentioned I would remove from my surfing. I removed the shopping channels, Spanish channel, music video channels and others. It would be just fine, fine, fine.

Ladybug

Ladybug
Originally uploaded by amayu.

Lori suggested that I do this with my car. I said, no!

other doors open?

I got a few phone calls today ... positive. Hmm, as doors close, others open.

Which way did he go?

What do you call a group of hawks? Nothing, they don't gather. The chicken hawk is here.
I looked at my shots and thought, 'why not'. Roger, what are these? Tweeting birds.
Read the script Roger, they're suppsoed to be stars!
I can give you stars Rolls!

babbadooba, not prince

Whoever he is, will be on display at halftime, likely with pole-riding or pelvis grinding dancers. Huh. The halftime show was just promptly rude, rather than "accidently" rude. I guess the planners just threw up their hands and left Howard Stern to direct the halftime. Prince interviewing some lady, while she talks about her petty little life and she strips down to a bluetooth on her ear.

Perhaps they could ask another person to put together the halftime show ... you know, with somebody more contemporary than Charlie Daniels, less blah than Bon Jovi, and stupid than Justin Timberlake-Janet Jackson. I don't like Barenaked Ladies, but I'd take them over some of the others. I'd rank them above Bon Jovi, and not as stupid of a choice as Jay-Z, Prince, Britney Spears, Madonna, etc.

Find a band ... that PLAYS intruments, has recent hits and that doesn't have to change or bleep out lyrics. That is a group you should choose. I'd actually like a carnival like halftime show or youth talent. This big-name, big-lame halftime does give me time to eat more chips, but I'd rather be entertained.

Prince ... blah. How about a comedy skit with forty some comedians, where each one gets a short round of standup and exposure. If you don't find her/him funny, it switches quickly to another person. I fear that they'll have a bum on stage performing music and then pull a Dixie Chicks. The comedian thing isn't long enough to remake a Michael Richards.

bitchcraft

I read a blurb by the AP that some folks are arguing about the State of the Union Address that President Bush has yet to make. Hey, you don't like what's going on, I get it, but wait for the speech, lamos! As I'm typing, in the background I hear NPR schpeel out the pre-address hype.

In the end, I'd like to see truth in advertising with the governing bodies. What clump of paper is signed into law. What did the committees put together that passed senate and congress and signed into law by the President? Better still, where does the money go? Funny, with all the bitching about the President, the other bodies are not listed as stage hands.

What the President needs to do: say what plans are, why they are and convice people that Iraq makes sense. I think most people are now pushing to the thought ... that crap isn't going to end. The question is, more troops yields faster results? That's a tough call. What I'd like to know is, after $1 billion daily in Iraq, which is what the congress/senate/Bush approved, what do we get? In the end, are we out of the Middle East? Are out no longer married to foreign oil? Do we get compensated for our investment?

I predict a no, no, no. So, we will spend more daily, may not finish faster, and won't get compensated nor divorced from foreign oil. I voted those losers into office so they can approved that? What kind of crap is that? I won't go on about Bush, but will focus instead on the government that does without writing things down for "the little people".

Why should I trade a tyrant 2000 miles away for 2000 tyrants next door? $1 billion daily now and it will cost more daily with 20,000 additonal troops.

I vote to have a pink slip sent to the lot of these people. Boot them and replace them with non-party people who are interested in following and writing law pertaining to American interests. War in Iraq I see no American interests there.

hawkish eyes

The birds fled and the squirrels were noisy. I wondered then saw this young lady waiting for the hungry, yet stupid, birds to journey back to the feeder to feed her. This hawk left in disgust. She also didn't like me taking her photo.

doors closed

I got a letter that a company "lucked into" getting a person with twelve years experience for the position I applied. Good for them, bad for me. I got a notice yesterday that a company went with another applicant. This was the third time this company told me the same thing ... kicking me when I'm down. I got another notice of, "no". I have potentials, but nothing I can hold.




It sucks navel lint out of a dog named Chunks, which blows

not worth a "yahoo"

I tried Yahoo pictures. While it runs like flickr, it has only a binary switch, which I don't like. You may either let EVERYONE look at your photo or only you. That needs fixing! It runs better than the flunky (small-size only when it was young). It has a slideshow feature, but it doesn't use the space that it has. I loaded some pictures up to it, but am not sure that I will use it. You cannot change a smart album to regular album or vise versa. I don't like the pressing on me or others to buy the flippin' pictures.

I haven't printed a picture in a long time. I'll be buggered if I'm getting them sent to me via post and pay lots of money for them, or pick them up at Target which isn't convenient. I'd download them, crop them, print them at Walgreens.

I would like a faster bulk download, even if it caps your download packet to ten or five pictures. I'll go back and play with it, but I like the fluidity of flickr better, as well as the versatility of who can see your photos.

predisposed to assinine behavior

That's me ABP, manifested in unlicensed mockery, satire and cynicism, marked with variable episodes of mania. I hope to find a treatment for act first, think later, but my discourteous impulsivity pervades my every action (missing thought). I do hope that one day I will not offend, by action or inaction.

I'll go back to the three "perfect" laws of iRobot.